Why have I rejected the coverage of the Boston bombings this week?

I have stayed on the fringes of this weeks pervasive coverage of the Boston explosion and subsequent manhunt with corresponding lockdown, and I have spoken very little about it to my Spanish husband, both non Spanish and Spanish friends here in Spain, and I have shied away from Facebook comments on it. Usually I watch the coverage of these types of events on all the international cable news stations I am fortunate enough to get here in Spain,  Spanish News, BBC, CNN, Fox, France´s TV5, Aljazeera in English, Russia´s RTE. I am a keen observer of the differences in the coverage, the nuances in the way a story is presented and then repeatedly reported picking out the variance in points of view of the major news event. I don´t have time to do this regularly with no major event or tragedy occupying 80% of the news coverage, but in these cases it is an insightful and interesting exercise for me on different country´s or cultures points of view of international events and issues, like this bombing in Boston.

In this case however, I have realized that I have only listened briefly to CNN and Spanish coverage, after scanning headlines in a few online sources I have only read a few articles, and I ask myself why. I have tried to look deep into this rejection I feel for this coverage to determine where it is rooted, I am not sure that I have found the answer but here is what my initial responses to that query say:

·         More and more I reject violence and aggressiveness, I have come to hate most Hollywood productions of good vs. evil where both the “good” guys and the “evil” guys use the same tactics to achieve their means – killing in many forms via hate, violence, weaponry and special effects.  These issues are pervasive in video games that so much of our population under the age of 40 play, and we see a proliferation of aggressiveness and violence in the day to day life in the U.S. So I refuse to partake in these movies and games because they make me feel uncomfortable and angry that these are the images we inundate our kids and youth with, and the ones that more and more they emulate. I decide to focus on the positive in my life and our society, and to think about how the world would be different if we focused on using other means to truly achieve a better world with more equality and less suffering so that the “evil” would have much less fertile ground to take root in. I believe these means are - understanding of your enemy/rival and their hate of you; empathy towards that hate, (because it is probably so similar to my own): a negotiated resolution where real compromise is made to reduce the situation/reason that cause the hate; helping to eradicate the many issues that often feed that hate:  suffering and poverty on the “weak/poor” via abuse and selfish actions of the “strong/rich”  - starvation, lack of health care, fear of other (countrymen as well as the military and police organizations supposedly there to protect them.) So I rejected the images of similar scenes in Boston - swat teams and police all over the streets . the “good”  hunting the “evil”.

 

·         More and more I reject the American reaction of festive celebration when the “enemy” is defeated – like those that partied in the street when Bin Laden was killed, and the applause and hero parade type atmosphere that was created when the 2^nd suspect was apprehended. 

 

       Yes, I understand that the U.S. protects itself and attempts to keep itself safe from these types of “terrorists” and that the citizens want to maintain their feeling of being protected and ability to live free of fear, but there is something that makes me reject the celebratory reaction. Perhaps it comes down to the fact that I think these events are sad, at the end of the day killing another human being is tragic and it highlights that we are in a society that somehow promotes the hate and division that make the “killing of the enemy” a necessity, and a celebrated one at that. And yes I would have a hard time arguing against the argument that if the authorities hadn´t done that job then how could the “good” U.S. citizens continue to live in safety, and yes there needs to be protection and then action so others thinking of similar action would be deterred. But at the same time I ask if the celebratory reactions don´t actually fuel the fire of those who already may consider similar action because they feel ostracized from, envious of, hateful towards the U.S.  And again it perpetrated the “good” vs “evil” story  that is used to legitimate wars, the huge military budget and the ultimately the whole arms and defense industry.

 

·         I also hate the personal coverage of the ones involved. The “heroes”:  the survivors, the family members of the perpetrators and those of the injured, the runners - I don´t know it seems like a three ring emotional circus built up to play on my heartstrings to further perpetuate the American need to have a “good” hero that saves us from “evil” or that reassures us that we are the “good” guys or the heroes. We fail to look at why the “evil” ones feel the urge, need, desire to hurt us – they are touted as heroes in their societies and we are touted as the “evil” ones, so the more we propogate that model, the more likely it is we will get more of the same instead of really making strides towards a truly better more peaceful world.   

In this inner reflection on why I have stayed on the periphery this week of all the coverage, and why I reject it, I have come to really realize that it represents what I reject in the way the American society (government, military, media, Hollywood, etc..) uses the good Hero vs the Evil enemy as a tool that has allowed them to become the sole “superpower” in today´s global world, but that by being so they have become one of the obstacles to a more just and peaceful world for all.

 

 

z